Chapter 3 of 5 · 12 min

LBO returns: MOIC, IRR and the three drivers

Where the sponsor's return comes from: EBITDA growth, the exit multiple and paying down debt.

By the end of this chapter you can
  • Calculate entry equity, exit equity, MOIC and IRR
  • Split the equity gain into growth, multiple change and debt paydown
  • Work out the exit multiple needed for a target MOIC
  • Explain what leverage does, and does not do, to returns
1

The intuition

You buy a $500,000 house with a $100,000 deposit and a $400,000 mortgage. Five years later you sell it for $600,000, having paid the mortgage down to $350,000. You walk away with $250,000.

The house rose 20%, but your $100,000 became $250,000: 2.5 times your money. Part came from the price rising and part from the mortgage you paid off. The borrowing did not make the house worth more; it concentrated the gain onto a small deposit.

The key idea

Exit equity = exit enterprise value − the debt still owed. MOIC = exit equity ÷ entry equity. The gain comes from three places: EBITDA growth, a change in the multiple, and debt paid down.

2

Why it works

  • At entry, enterprise value = EBITDA × entry multiple, debt = turns × EBITDA, and equity is the difference.
  • At exit, enterprise value = exit EBITDA × exit multiple, the remaining debt is repaid first, and the sponsor keeps the rest.
  • MOIC (multiple of invested capital) = exit equity ÷ entry equity. IRR = MOIC^(1 ÷ years) − 1: the same gain as a yearly rate.
  • The three drivers. Growth: the rise in EBITDA × the entry multiple. Multiple change: exit EBITDA × (exit multiple − entry multiple). Paydown: the debt repaid. Together they equal the equity gain.
  • Multiple expansion is the least reliable driver, because it depends on the market at exit. Sponsors rarely underwrite it.
  • Leverage magnifies whatever the business does, in both directions, and adds interest cost and covenant risk.
EBITDA $100M bought at 10x with 6.0x of debt; five years later EBITDA is $150M, exit at 10x, debt repaid to $300M
Entry equity: 1,000 − 600400
Exit equity: 150 × 10 − 3001,200
MOIC: 1,200 ÷ 4003.0x
IRR: 3.0^(1/5) − 124.6%
Growth: (150 − 100) × 10500
Multiple change: 150 × (10 − 10)0
Paydown: 600 − 300300 (gain 500 + 0 + 300 = 800)
3

The formulas

Entry equity = entry EBITDA × entry multiple − entry debt

The sponsor's check.

Exit EBITDA = entry EBITDA × (1 + g)^n

Growth compounded over the hold.

Exit equity = exit EBITDA × exit multiple − debt remaining

What is left after the lenders are repaid.

MOIC = exit equity ÷ entry equity

How many times the money.

IRR = MOIC^(1/n) − 1

The same result as a yearly rate.

4

Worked example

Entry equity, exit equity, then turn the multiple of money into a yearly rate.

Drawing the numbers…
5

See it move

Same deal. Change the price, the leverage, the growth, the exit multiple, the paydown and the length of the hold.

Drawing the numbers…
Try this
  • Raise EBITDA growth. Exit enterprise value and exit equity rise, so MOIC and IRR rise.
  • Lower the exit multiple. Exit equity falls by the whole drop in exit enterprise value, because the lenders are still repaid in full.
  • Raise the share of debt repaid. Exit equity rises by exactly the extra debt repaid.
  • Lengthen the hold. MOIC rises because EBITDA keeps growing, but watch the IRR: the gain is spread over more years.
6

Run it backwards

Same deal, reversed: the investment committee needs a set MOIC. What exit multiple do you have to believe in?

Drawing the numbers…

The equity needed at exit is the target MOIC × entry equity. The lenders must be repaid too, so the exit enterprise value has to cover both. Divide that by exit EBITDA to get the multiple.

Compare it with the entry multiple. If it is higher, the deal depends on multiple expansion, which few committees will accept. You would need more growth, more paydown or a lower price.

7

Traps

Forgetting to subtract the debt at exit.
The sponsor gets exit enterprise value less the debt still owed, not the whole enterprise value.
Dividing MOIC by the years to get IRR.
Returns compound. IRR = MOIC^(1/n) − 1: 2.0x over five years is about 15%, not 20%.
Saying leverage creates value.
It concentrates the value the business creates onto a smaller check, and magnifies losses just as much.
Underwriting multiple expansion.
The exit multiple depends on markets you do not control. A sound case works at or below the entry multiple.
Ignoring the length of the hold.
The same MOIC over more years is a lower IRR. Sponsors care about both.
8

Say it in the interview

The interviewer asks

What drives returns in an LBO?

Say yours out loud first, then compare.
9

Check yourself

4 fresh questions, with new numbers. Answer each one correctly to finish the chapter. Get one wrong and you will see the full working, then you can try it again with new numbers.

Answers within 1% are marked right. Type the number; $, %, x and M are fine. First tries count toward Learned: the topic is Learned once every chapter is done and 75% of first tries were right.

0 of 4
Drawing your questions…
Remember
  • Exit equity = exit EV − debt remaining.
  • MOIC = exit equity ÷ entry equity; IRR = MOIC^(1/n) − 1.
  • Returns come from growth, multiple change and paydown.
  • Leverage magnifies returns both ways; it does not create value.